Abortion

Granted, It's a touchy subject, but it must be faced if we are to prevent inhuman activity.
First of all, the obvious conservative retort to this issue is "How could you kill a baby?" But others argue that it doesn't count as a human being--whether it's an embryo or a fetus--and even that the baby isn't alive, per se. Where does the science come in here? The baby's taking in nutrients from the mother. Of course it's alive! Admittedly, in the early stages it doesn't look much like a human being, but who in their right mind would allow a person, even an unborn baby, to be killed on grounds that it looks nothing like a human? Anybody besides me sense a tie-in with discrimination of race? Just because it looks different you can say it isn't a human? If it will develop into a human, it is a human. Another thing: the baby is not part of the mother. Blood doesn't mix between them. The immune system of the mother thinks the baby is a foreign object, and will reject it if it is not protected correctly. The mother can cut off her thumb if she wants, because that is part of her, but she cannot kill the baby. These ideas of mother and child being the same person are ridiculous and completely unscientific. Just by the way the advocates say these things, you can tell that they know abortion is wrong inside them.
Oh, I forgot to mention. People who are for abortion prefer the name pro-choice, not pro-abortion. The choice to kill a baby. What a choice! So, us conservatives are supposed to be anti-choice? We're for choice, all right, but the choice to not have a baby in the first place. The idea that we should give a break to irresponsible pregnant teens so they can correct their mistake is preposterous. Once you have human life in you, you have no control over the baby's life. But still, pro-choice people say, "Why should you have control over the woman's body?" Well, why should the woman have control over the baby's body? What kind of country allows the killing of helpless children? The bottom line is, would you kill a baby just because you were too lazy to take care of it? There's a special place called "The Orphanage" if you don't want to take responsibility for your actions. And that's not cruel, compared to no life at all. What if your parents had you when they were teens and couldn't face the idea of raising a child at their age, so they aborted you?
Human life should NEVER be compromised, whether laziness or over-population is a concern or not.

The Battle has Begun

There are three types of people here in America:
Liberals and Democrats. They oppose traditions, support environmentalist laws, and support lots of laws to regulate business.
Conservatives and Republicans. They favor family values, disagree with passing "green" laws, and oppose government interferance in business and everyday life.
People who Don't Care. The name says it all.
Unfortunately, the liberals and democrats have the upper hand today. after all, Barack Obama is in office, and he is a supporter of the democratic party. Many argue that that isn't in any way unfortunate. Some say he is saving America from all the horrible things Bush has done. Well, I'm here to say otherwise, and tell why the american way of life that all of us dream of having is very different from the democrat way of life. Democrats (and environmentalists, for that matter) want peoples lives to be more regulated--more protected by the government. When my next posts begin to appear every week, I will introduce an issue that is widely supported by liberals and tell why it is contrary to the Constitution of the United States--contrary, albeit secretly, to our American way of life, which despite some opinions is in fact the BEST way of life on the earth.